This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: ser-unix.c: Add hardware flow control support
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at mips dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Chris Dearman <chris at mips dot com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at linux-mips dot org>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:10:56 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: ser-unix.c: Add hardware flow control support
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0703301233210.3670@perivale.mips.com> <20070330120821.GA7415@caradoc.them.org>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I noticed while looking for the right place to put the option that we
> have an empty "set serial". Perhaps it should go under that instead.
> No strong preference.
Well, we have "set remotebaud", which is at the top-level as well. And
which actually raises a question as to whether "set remoteflow" should not
be handled through "struct serial_ops" too? This way other serial
interfaces would have a chance to handle the option as well if somebody
cared.
Any opinions?
Maciej