This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] varobj deletion after the binary has changed
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Denis PILAT <denis dot pilat at st dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:41:03 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC] varobj deletion after the binary has changed
- References: <20070123124457.GA1600@nevyn.them.org> <45B63A49.4010609@st.com> <45B8E8A8.9040904@st.com> <17849.12231.246980.478169@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070125232731.GA30178@nevyn.them.org> <45BDEAEC.1050006@st.com> <17854.28971.170898.231523@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45C0B042.9040308@st.com> <17857.2617.164646.935952@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45C1B78C.60605@st.com>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:49:00AM +0100, Denis PILAT wrote:
> Anyway thanks for your comments, I'll take them into account once you've
> tested the test and once Daniel gives me a feedback about the C part of
> the patch.
The C seems reasonable to me; though let's not check it in until we
have a documentation update to go with it, if possible. How about
under the -var-update section, by the example which uses
in_scope="true"?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery