This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: MI testsuite to use PTY for inferior


 > If it would be OK, I'd prefer to just have the TTY work with all MI
 > tests, not making it optional. I'd like to repost the patch with all of
 > the problems found already, and with that additional change. Is this OK?
 > 
 > My theory is that no FE can/should use MI with out separating the inferior
 > output via a pty. So, it's OK to test GDB under these assumptions.

 I think you should at least test for ptys first, so that the old tests are
run if/when they are not available.  More generally I think its wrong to force
the frontend to separate the output.  Currently, I get reasonable behaviour
with Emacs without doing this and would always include interleaved output as a
user option.

Nick


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]