Re: typo in gdb/gdb_ptrace.c

[Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>]

   From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
   Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com

   Chad Harrington <harrington.chad@gmail.com> writes:

   > Below is the diff patch for my fix.  It is not critical, but it sure
   > looks like a mistake to me.  This was in gdb-6.3, as you can see.  The
   > preprocessor is told to define PT_ATTACH if PTRACE_DETACH is defined. 
   > I think it should only define PT_ATTACH if PTRACE_ATTACH is defined,
   > but I think they'd both be defined if one or the other is already
   > defined anyway...  It merely appears to be a typo. :-)

   There is another typo in the previous line.  I've checked this in as
   obvious.

   2005-06-23  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>

	   * gdb_ptrace.h: Fix typos when checking for PT_ATTACH.  Reported
	   by Chad Harrington <harrington.chad@gmail.com>.

Thanks!

Mark