Re: [PATCH] Removal of markup annotations

[Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>]

 > Out of all of the annotations that you are removing here, CGDB only
 > depends on annotate_breakpoints_headers, annotate_field,
 > annotate_breakpoints_table, annotate_record and
 > annotate_breakpoints_table_end.

These are undocumented annotations and just mark up the output.  Could
you parse it from the syntax instead?

 > I'll have to look deeper to verify this, but if this is true, it would
 > really simplify my life if we could leave those in. That at least would
 > allow CGDB to work with the next release of GDB while I work on
 > GDB/MI and getting CGDB to integrate with it.

I've come to the conclusion that a fully working GDB/MI is a major task.
Sorting out annotations could be done much more quickly.

Nick