This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> > Thanks for the couple of suggestions. Is the attached better? > > Yes, though I'm confused as to why you didn't use the 4 or 5 insn > hand-coded routine that I gave you, which is more like what you would > get from the compiler with -O2 -ffast-math. Because I'm lazy? ;-). Seriously, that was a good suggestion, and I have now used it in this iteration of the testcase. I took this opportunity to actually test all forms of FP branch instructions, with branch taken and branch not taken. That way, that should cover most cases. I left the edge cases for another time. 2005-05-20 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> * gdb.arch/alpha-step.c: New file. * gdb.arch/alpha-step.exp: New testcase. Tested on alpha-tru64 5.1a. We now have 21 FAILs revealed by this testcase. Before the following patch was applied, we had 30. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-05/msg00479.html I used an ancient version of GDB, before the switch to software single-step was made, and I have an all PASS. Will investigate the FAILs as soon as possible. OK to apply? Thanks, -- Joel
Attachment:
alpha-step.c
Description: Text document
Attachment:
alpha-step.exp
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |