This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: gdb.base/auxv.exp: 'untested' instead of gdb_suppress_entire_file
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 02 May 2005 15:56:00 -0500
- Subject: Re: RFA: gdb.base/auxv.exp: 'untested' instead of gdb_suppress_entire_file
- References: <vt2hdhle95k.fsf@zenia.home><20050502191423.GA16849@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:10:31PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> >
> > Looking at this message:
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00143.html
> >
> > I gather that changes like the below are welcome --- right?
> >
> > 2005-05-02 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
> >
> > * gdb.base/auxv.exp: Call 'untested' and return -1 instead of
> > calling gdb_suppress_entire_file.
>
> Please, yes. The results of gdb_suppress_entire_file are so messy!
Okay --- I've committed this one. Thanks!