This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: gdb.base/auxv.exp: 'untested' instead of gdb_suppress_entire_file
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 15:14:23 -0400
- Subject: Re: RFA: gdb.base/auxv.exp: 'untested' instead of gdb_suppress_entire_file
- References: <vt2hdhle95k.fsf@zenia.home>
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:10:31PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
>
> Looking at this message:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00143.html
>
> I gather that changes like the below are welcome --- right?
>
> 2005-05-02 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
>
> * gdb.base/auxv.exp: Call 'untested' and return -1 instead of
> calling gdb_suppress_entire_file.
Please, yes. The results of gdb_suppress_entire_file are so messy!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC