This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [commit] note non-building architectures


Mark Kettenis wrote:

  Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 11:57:10 -0400
  From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 19:11:47 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> > As part of getting ready for GCC 4, I've found that a number of arches > don't build with gcc-3.4 when using gdb_mbuild.sh. As an aid, and to > stop me and presumably others from going round in circles, I've updated > the MAINTAINERS file to both reflect current reality note the problem.
> > I think your GCC 3.4 is busted.


My GCC? What a strange turn of expression. I'm pretty sure the warning will also happen with your gcc.

Nope, 2.95.3 and 3.3.5 are fine.  And as Andreas Schwab there's a GCC
bug report for this problem.  Alas, this is not an ideal world where
compiler warnings involve no false positives.

This will probably be fixed eventually, either on the GCC side, or by
adding a workaround to BFD.  Meanwhile I want us to take notice that
the fact that vax and m68k are in pretty good shape and that listing
them as broken in MAINTAINERS is no indication that there is something
wrong with those targets themselves.

Perhaps the status note could be enhanced to say
"builds with -Wno-error" or some such.

Stan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]