This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Assume solib.h

From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl, joseph at codesourcery dot com, kevinb at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:59:07 -0500
Subject: Re: Assume solib.h
References: <4193BFA0.3060607@gnu.org> <200411112005.iABK5FrV098628@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4193DDCE.7060205@gnu.org> <200411112224.iABMODmo099121@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4194DBEB.6010304@gnu.org> <01c4c8db$Blat.v2.2.2$377f5020@zahav.net.il>

I'm with Mark on this one: a patch that potentially breaks a supported
platform doesn't get my vote.  If a platform is supported, it deserves
that we don't break it, and calling it ``marginal'' doesn't change
anything.

Eli, can you perhaphs explain what exactly you mean by "supported", how the GNU project benefits by expending already limited resources on continually fixing vax-ultrix - a non GNU system, and how my change breaks it?

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Assume solib.h
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Assume solib.h
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- Assume solib.h
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: Assume solib.h
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Assume solib.h
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: Assume solib.h
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Assume solib.h
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: Assume solib.h
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]