This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: SH 2a - Part 4: Begin using RETURN_VALUE

From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:20:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: SH 2a - Part 4: Begin using RETURN_VALUE
References: <20040909124701.GA7927@cygbert.vinschen.de><16738.43902.850632.187540@localhost.redhat.com><20041006090809.GE3744@cygbert.vinschen.de>

Corinna Vinschen writes:
 > 
 > Yes, that's apparently right.  As I wrote, "I would love to...", because
 > time has gone a bit over that naming scheme and I think, changing the
 > names to reflect their usage in a more general way would help when reading
 > the code in future.
 > 
 > Is it ok to rename them?

Sure, send a patch.

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH] sh-tdep.c: Rename store/extract functions for better readability (was Re: [PATCH]: SH 2a - Part 4: Begin using RETURN_VALUE)
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

References:
- Re: [PATCH]: SH 2a - Part 4: Begin using RETURN_VALUE
  - From: Elena Zannoni
- Re: [PATCH]: SH 2a - Part 4: Begin using RETURN_VALUE
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]