This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:35:02 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2
- References: <40A9264C.4060404@redhat.com> <20040617030603.GC23443@nevyn.them.org> <40D20494.2020608@redhat.com> <20040619235857.GA18759@nevyn.them.org> <16598.64375.217285.743094@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <16601.25623.949217.642524@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <20040623134742.GA24612@nevyn.them.org> <40D9FC3B.3030700@redhat.com> <20040623230138.GA6426@nevyn.them.org> <40EB1DDD.4070603@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:47:09PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:55:07PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> >
> >>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:05:59PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>This patch is now in mainline. Is there anything else you need?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yes. Two sets of questions left, one for Jeff and one [plus a little
> >>>bit] for you...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Jeff, one test still fails: calling addprint. I think this is mostly a
> >>>GDB problem rather than GCC. Before starting the program I see this:
> >>>
> >>
> >>Let me take a look at it. It is not failing in my all-patches-applied
> >>build. Perhaps in splitting the patches up, I screwed up and missed
> >>something.
> >
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
>
> Ok, I figured out what piece I left out and have remade the patch. I can't
> remember where we are on this regarding the workaround for gcc debug-info,
> but at least you will be able to run the test with the full functionality
> now. Please let me know what is needed next as I want to move this forward.
Hi Jeff,
With Andrew's latest GCJ change, you can remove the bit I objected to for
method names. After that I'm happy with the patch. A dwarf2read
maintainer will need to have final review on the dwarf2read bits, so
you may want to post a final patch and ping them.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz