This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> -@code{"&" @var{c-string}} > +@code{"&" @var{c-string} @var{nl}} > > @item @var{nl} @expansion{} > @code{CR | CR-LF}
This part all looks correct, can you just post it separatly with a ChangeLog.
OK
> -static void core_files_info (struct target_ops *); > +static void core_files_info (struct target_ops *, struct ui_out *);
Again, just this part (through out) is all ok, can you please post it.
I'm not sure what exactly you mean here. Do you mean that the change to the *_info(...) _interface_ is all ok?
Or the interface plus implementation (main work being in exec_info(), the others (core, go32, hpux, child, monitor, etc..) considered as follow-ups)? Or the changes to mi/cmd-file.cc and mi/mi-cmds.cc? Or all 3? (which I hope)
>}, > +{start-address="0x0804970c",end-address="0x08049710",section-name=".bss" >}]}] +(@value{GDBP}) > +@end smallexample
I like it. But lets get the other changes in first.
Are you really only talking about the doc-changes here? If that's true and (thus) you are agreeing to my main (ie. gdb/mi source code) changes, why would we want to wait here?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |