This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/dwarf-2] Fix for the null record problem
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>
- To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:26:55 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFA/dwarf-2] Fix for the null record problem
- References: <20040219140145.GB804@gnat.com> <16437.11835.435941.553479@localhost.redhat.com> <20040401011813.GE888@gnat.com>
Ping?
The patch is quite tiny, seems almost obvious, and Elena seemed happy
with it. But it didn't get in because she asked that a testcase be added
first (on Feb 19):
<<
the patch looks sensible, but I would like to see the testcase go in
at the same time, or we'll forget.
>>
The new testcase has been checked in now, so I was wondering if somebody
had a moment to have a look at it, and confirm Elena's first review?
Thanks,
> > > I have found the source of the problem, and suggest the attached patch.
> > > The problem was that GDB was mistakenly deducing that the empry record
> > > was only a stub because of the lack of fields, and was therefore tagging
> > > it with TYPE_FLAG_STUB. This is not correct. Instead, the right
> > > approach, I believe, is to check for the DW_AT_declaration attribute.
> > >
> > > 2004-02-19 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
> > >
> > > * dwarf2read.c (read_structure_scope): Identify stub types
> > > using the DW_AT_declaration attribute.
> > >
> > > tested on x86-linux. No regression. Fixes the testcase that was
> > > proposed by Andrew (even though it is not legal C) and the Ada
> > > case.
> > >
> > > OK to apply?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > > Joel
> > >
> > > Index: dwarf2read.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.130
> > > diff -u -p -r1.130 dwarf2read.c
> > > --- dwarf2read.c 28 Jan 2004 18:43:06 -0000 1.130
> > > +++ dwarf2read.c 19 Feb 2004 13:58:42 -0000
> > > @@ -3077,6 +3077,9 @@ read_structure_scope (struct die_info *d
> > > TYPE_LENGTH (type) = 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_declaration, cu) != NULL)
> > > + TYPE_FLAGS (type) |= TYPE_FLAG_STUB;
> > > +
> > > /* We need to add the type field to the die immediately so we don't
> > > infinitely recurse when dealing with pointers to the structure
> > > type within the structure itself. */
> > > @@ -3213,11 +3216,6 @@ read_structure_scope (struct die_info *d
> > > new_symbol (die, type, cu);
> > >
> > > do_cleanups (back_to);
> > > - }
> > > - else
> > > - {
> > > - /* No children, must be stub. */
> > > - TYPE_FLAGS (type) |= TYPE_FLAG_STUB;
> > > }
> > >
> > > processing_current_prefix = previous_prefix;
--
Joel