This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)

From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: ford at vss dot fsi dot com, jimb at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:30:38 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0403311727300.21204@thing1-200> <vt2wu4zaa27.fsf@zenia.home> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0404011138010.21204@thing1-200> <vt24qs39ymv.fsf@zenia.home> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0404011553100.21204@thing1-200> <8011-Fri02Apr2004094123+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:41:23 +0200
> From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> Some time ago I did find a problem in register numbering, and IIRC it
> was fixed, although I don't recall the details and don't see anything
> in the logs.

Found it.  See the thread started by this message:

  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-07/msg00392.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
  - From: Brian Ford

References:
- [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
  - From: Brian Ford
- Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
  - From: Brian Ford
- Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
  - From: Brian Ford
- Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]