This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
What portability problem.
The TUI code is including header files and using library functions that we've never used before in GDB. We've already seen the fall-out from this on HP-UX and Solaris, and now on FreeBSD. I'm just afraid that more of these problems will surface when somebody tries to build GDB other platforms.
Is there a reason for changing "" to <>, it breaks some of GDB's scripts.
I changed because we seem to use <> everywhere else in GDB for the readline includes, e.g. event-top.c, completer.c. I think it's good to be consistent; you get less surprises that way.
I'll change them so that they are consistent. gdb_makefile.sh: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/ari/gdb_makefile.sh knows about "..." includes.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |