Re: RFA: lin-lwp cleanup

[Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> This patch doesn't do anything particularly important.  I just moved some
> code from stop_wait_callback out to a new function.  I thought I'd need it
> for my next patch; I turned out not to, but it's still cleaner this way.
>
> Also fixes the two small problems I asked Jeff about earlier today - an
> extra call to lin_lwp_thread_alive and a missing delete_thread.
>
> Is this OK?

There's a bit more here than code movement -- the new code is not
identical to the old, even allowing for the jjohnstn changes.

If you'll say a word or two about the differences, I expect I'll approve 
them.