This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfa] struct dictionary

From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:30:31 -0400
Subject: Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
References: <ro1k7dbwprh.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><16101.3585.739945.993550@localhost.redhat.com><20030609225505.GA12898@nevyn.them.org><20030610000524.GS947@gnat.com>

Joel Brobecker writes:
 > > > Does anybody have a setup for testing mdebug? Daniel?
 > > 
 > > Not me.  Joel might?  Since OSF/Tru64 is about the only thing left
 > > using it that we care about...
 > 
 > We have a Tru64 machine, but no C++ compiler... Is this still ok?
 > 

yes, this is generic stuff. Even though maybe some c++ symbols would
make any performance difference more pronounced. The important change is the
removal of the sorting for the symbol lists.

elena

 > -- 
 > Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
  - From: David Carlton

References:
- Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
  - From: Elena Zannoni
- Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]