>2003-06-03 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
>
> * alpha-osf1-tdep.c (alpha_osf1_skip_sigtramp_frame): Replace
> references to struct frame_info fields by calls to the equivalent
> accessors. Necessary now that frame_info is opaque.
> (alpha_osf1_pc_in_sigtramp): Likewise.
>
>Looks ok?
Yes. If you're feeling game you could use get_frame_memory, but
either way.
Andrew, please forgive for not having followed the discussions about
the new frame architecture too closely (I did go and read the messages
you recently pointed out to Daniel, though!).
You are saying either way; however, my current understanding is that
get_frame_memory is not currently any different from the above, but
is still a better approach in the long run if we eventually want to be
multi-everything. Is it correct?