On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:51:13PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:37:22PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>>The implementation is very much modeled on the frame-unwind code. Debug
>>readers are expected to register their own high level frame-base handler.
>
>
>So what will the process for getting a dwarf2-debug-info frame
>registered look like?
The current interface is identical to frame-unwind.
>How will we figure out that this function has
>dwarf2 debug info? It's not trivial... we don't have that information
>around any more on a per-PC basis.
Ask the frame's function's symbol or block.
Symbols don't currently have this information, nor do blocks.