Re: [rfa/doco] FRAME_FP -> read_fp

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

Really old thread:

Eli, I'm dropping this patch.  Instead, I'm doing the full rewrite.

Andrew

> > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:25:43 -0500
> > From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > Ahm, what does this mean, exactly, "read_fp in the machine description"?  
> > > Isn't read_fp a function?  If so, how can it be present ``in the machine 
> > > description''?
> > regcache.c contains:
> >
> > CORE_ADDR
> > read_fp (void)
> > {
> >    return TARGET_READ_FP ();
> > }
> >
> > and TARGET_READ_FP() is part of the machine description (a.k.a. 
> > architecture vector).
>
> Yes, but still I find it confusing to tell that a function is in the
> machine description.  A machine description is a bunch of macros and
> machine-specific functions, right?  And read_fp is neither of these,
> right?
>
>
> > Hmm, I guess this could do with a similar s/FP_REGNUM/read_fp/ 
> > transformation?
>
> Probably.