This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: OC?

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Marko Mlinar <markom at opencores dot org>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:09:07 -0500
Subject: Re: OC?
References: <3DF6642E.7020700@redhat.com> <200212110807.45649.markom@opencores.org>

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 23:01, Andrew Cagney wrote:

Marko,

What changes to the core of gdb are still needed for your target?

Andrew


Hi Andrew!

thanks for coming back to me.

As far as I can recall:

#define HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT
Needs to be discussed whether to add it to architecture or target vector?

Turns out this has been done.

We have also problems with registers. You were saying something that we should move all the registers (we have 8k+ registers with generated names) into the temporary storage (I hope all these won't get cached in the host...).

Yes.  A gui for instance will likely want access to all names at once.

I hope I have not missed anything; we will see what is comming anyway after we try to build the files.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OC?
  - From: Marko Mlinar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]