This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa] store.exp failures

On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 14:37:32 -0500, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:



Thanks.  In case you're wondering, yes it does pass but with older
compilers.


Do you see the two failures with GCC 2.95.3 that I see, by the way?
They're

FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: new up struct 1
FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: new up struct 2

I don't know if they're our fault or GCC's fault.  (Or even nobody's
fault: the test seems a bit delicate.)
BTW, what makes you think the test is delicate? The code is valid C and the command:

(gdb) set variable u = s_1

is valid in GDB's CLI. If it doesn't work, its a bug.

Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]