This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc/rfa:doco] Use @sc{gdb}?
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 12:33:36 +0300
- Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa:doco] Use @sc{gdb}?
- References: <3D66B84F.6010803@ges.redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:33:51 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
>
> I got annoyed at all the GDB's in the formatted manual being really
> large so tried changing them to @sc{gdb}. It fixed that problem but I'm
> not sure that I like the final result :-) (You'll need to build
> gdb.pdf, gdb ps or gdb.dvi).
>
> Is there a style guide thing on this one? Eli?
There are no strict rules on this one, AFAIK. If the results of
@sc{gdb} look nice to people, let's do it; if not, let's not.
Personally, I like the results of @sc in such cases.