This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Like I said, it feels un-natural so it definitly takes getting accustomed to :-) Anyway, the comment, yes like it. In case you're wondering, the username/date convention came about because people realised they couldn't identify when they were reading 15(!?) year old comments that described problems on systems that no longer exist!The ChangeLog need only state what changed, not why. Whoops, sorry about that. How about this patch?
It's looking in the CVS commit message (which is typically a duplicate of the changelog anyway). Hmm, this means that you've figured out that the best thing to stick in the CVS commit message is the changelog! :-)By the way, am I correct in thinking that the ChangeLog is supposed to mention the PR number? I noticed that GNATS picked up some of my earlier changes, and I'm assuming it noticed the PR number from the log message.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |