This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/ob] not_a_breakpoint -> not_a_sw_breakpoint
- From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:43:12 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch/ob] not_a_breakpoint -> not_a_sw_breakpoint
- References: <3D5D1C3E.8070203@ges.redhat.com>
On Aug 16, 11:37am, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> This patch renames the ``not_a_breakpoint'' parameter of
> bpstat_stop_status() to the more correct ``not_a_sw_breakpoint'' so that
> it is clear that it is indicating nothing about hardware breakpoints.
This may be a good change, but I don't think it's obvious. Could
you at least explain the reasoning that lead you to conclude that
the parameter in question indicates nothing about hardware breakpoints?
Kevin