This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch/rfc] Don't include vector registers in ``info registers''


On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 07:51:57PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The attached patch modifies the generic ``info registsters'' command so 
> that it precludes vector registers (in addition to floating-point 
> registers).  The online doco indicates:
> 
> (gdb) help info registers
> List of integer registers and their contents, for selected stack frame.
> Register name as argument means describe only that register.
> (gdb) help info all-registers
> List of all registers and their contents, for selected stack frame.
> Register name as argument means describe only that register.
> 
> I think the change makes the behavour a better match for both the 
> documentation and what I think is the intent of the command.  Print a 
> minimal set of registers.
> 
> It will eventually affect the i386 -- I've a patch to change the type of 
> xmm [and mmx] registers to true vectors.  When that is in, ``info 
> registers'' will stop displaying the xmm registers.
> 
> Thoughts?

My only comment is that I would also like ``info registers'' not to
print kernel-mode or processor status registers, since that seems (to
me) to be appropriate; it should print registers for stack/pc and
computation primarily, not things like the MSR.

Might be harder to do generically though.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]