This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [hjl@lucon.org: PATCH: Fix restarting breakpoint (Re: gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints)]
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 00:00:33 -0400
- Subject: Re: [hjl@lucon.org: PATCH: Fix restarting breakpoint (Re: gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints)]
- References: <20020515031407.GA19581@nevyn.them.org> <np1ycbu31v.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Well... which is more intuitive? If I step over a line in an
optimized program, and step until I end up on it again (i.e. it was
divided into parts) and type 'break', I think that ending up at $PC
again is more natural. But I see a good argument either way.
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:43:24PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
>
> Regarding the change to create_breakpoints: would it be possible to
> choose an addr string more expressive than `*HEX-ADDRESS'? For
> example, if you could use the symtab and line from sals, then the
> breakpoint would float better.
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
>
> > This patch was proposed for 5.2 far too late in the release cycle, but
> > then it simply got lost. Could someone please review it? I just ran
> > into the bug again, and it's really annoying.
> >
> > Summary: Breakpoints which were set by "break\n", using an implicit
> > source location, are lost across multiple runs.
> >
> >
> > From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> > Subject: PATCH: Fix restarting breakpoint (Re: gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints)
> > To: Michael Veksler <veksler@il.ibm.com>
> > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:33:49 -0700
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 04:57:56PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:52:51AM +0300, Michael Veksler wrote:
> > > > /References/: <20020322095020.A12445@lucon.org
> > > > <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-03/msg00196.html> >
> > > > <3C9B76F5.6050809@cygnus.com
> > > > <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-03/msg00198.html> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:24:53PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > > > > > When I do
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (gdb) b 100
> > > > > > (gdb) cond 1 i == 3
> > > > > > (gdb) r
> > > > > > (gdb) r
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gdb 5.2 will remove the conditional breakpoints on Linux/x86 after I
> > > > > > restart the debug session. Am I the only one who sees it?
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be very helpful if you could illustrate this problem by
> > > > > submitting a real testcase. That way people can run it and check
> > > > > before/after effects on various platforms and GDB releases.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here are the instructions for reproducing this annoying problem:
> > > >
> > > > // Debugged source:
> > > > typedef int operation(int val);
> > > >
> > > > int f(operation * op, int value)
> > > > {
> > > > return op(value);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > int nop(int val)
> > > > {
> > > > return val;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > int main()
> > > > {
> > > > return f(nop, 5);
> > > > }
> > > > // End source
> > > >
> > > > Compile it on Linux using gcc 3.0.4 or redhat's 2.96 (did not test it
> > > > on other versions).
> > > > (gdb) b main
> > > > (gdb) r
> > > > Breakpoint 1, main () at t.c:15
> > > > 15 return f(nop, 5);
> > > > (gdb) s
> > > > f (op=0x8048448 <nop>, value=5) at t.c:5
> > > > 5 return op(value);
> > > > (gdb) b
> > > > Breakpoint 2 at 0x8048432: file t.c, line 5.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the testcase. Basically, we deleted all break points set
> > > with "break" when we restart. It is a very bad regression from gdb
> > > 4.17. Here is a patch. May I check it into gdb 5.2?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > H.J.
> > > ----
> > > 2002-04-17 H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
> > >
> > > * breakpoint.c (create_thread_event_breakpoint): Use xasprintf.
> > > (create_breakpoints): Make sure the addr_string field is not
> > > NULL.
> > >
> >
> > Here is an update. It just uses
> >
> > xasprintf (&b->addr_string, "*0x%s", paddr (b->address));
> >
> > H.J.
> > ---
> > 2002-04-17 H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
> >
> > * breakpoint.c (create_thread_event_breakpoint): Use xasprintf.
> > (create_breakpoints): Make sure the addr_string field is not
> > NULL.
> >
> > --- gdb/breakpoint.c.break Wed Mar 6 22:30:42 2002
> > +++ gdb/breakpoint.c Wed Apr 17 17:29:58 2002
> > @@ -3859,14 +3859,12 @@ struct breakpoint *
> > create_thread_event_breakpoint (CORE_ADDR address)
> > {
> > struct breakpoint *b;
> > - char addr_string[80]; /* Surely an addr can't be longer than that. */
> >
> > b = create_internal_breakpoint (address, bp_thread_event);
> >
> > b->enable_state = bp_enabled;
> > /* addr_string has to be used or breakpoint_re_set will delete me. */
> > - sprintf (addr_string, "*0x%s", paddr (b->address));
> > - b->addr_string = xstrdup (addr_string);
> > + xasprintf (&b->addr_string, "*0x%s", paddr (b->address));
> >
> > return b;
> > }
> > @@ -4422,7 +4420,12 @@ create_breakpoints (struct symtabs_and_l
> > b->number = breakpoint_count;
> > b->cond = cond[i];
> > b->thread = thread;
> > - b->addr_string = addr_string[i];
> > + if (addr_string[i])
> > + b->addr_string = addr_string[i];
> > + else
> > + /* addr_string has to be used or breakpoint_re_set will delete
> > + me. */
> > + xasprintf (&b->addr_string, "*0x%s", paddr (b->address));
> > b->cond_string = cond_string[i];
> > b->ignore_count = ignore_count;
> > b->enable_state = bp_enabled;
> >
> >
> > ----------
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
> > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer