This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] FORTRAN95 Expression parser


Petr Sorfa wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've created a FORTRAN95 expression parser for GDB. It is based off the
> current FORTRAN expression parser, but has changed significantly in
> source and functionality. I've developed it as a new separate parser
> with the file prefix of f95-x as opposed to the existing f-x files.
> 
> The question is whether I should submit the patch as the f95-x files
> (which will leave the current FORTRAN parser untouched) or replace the
> existing FORTRAN parser?
> 
> Note that the F95 parser fully supports F77/F90/F95, but differs a bit
> from the existing fortran gdb parser (which relies a bit heavily on C
> notation.)

How much does it differ?  Functionally?  In user-visible ways?
How about test suites?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]