This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] FORTRAN95 Expression parser
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- To: Petr Sorfa <petrs at caldera dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com" <gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:36:51 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFC] FORTRAN95 Expression parser
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <3CCD99D3.66CD0B7E@caldera.com>
Petr Sorfa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've created a FORTRAN95 expression parser for GDB. It is based off the
> current FORTRAN expression parser, but has changed significantly in
> source and functionality. I've developed it as a new separate parser
> with the file prefix of f95-x as opposed to the existing f-x files.
>
> The question is whether I should submit the patch as the f95-x files
> (which will leave the current FORTRAN parser untouched) or replace the
> existing FORTRAN parser?
>
> Note that the F95 parser fully supports F77/F90/F95, but differs a bit
> from the existing fortran gdb parser (which relies a bit heavily on C
> notation.)
How much does it differ? Functionally? In user-visible ways?
How about test suites?