This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC3.1-based compiler)

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at ACT-Europe dot FR>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 16 Apr 2002 09:06:30 -0400
Subject: Re: .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC3.1-based compiler)
References: <20020411181942.H29472@act-europe.fr><20020411150444.A14251@nevyn.them.org><20020412104307.C16134@act-europe.fr> <20020412103435.A24938@nevyn.them.org>

> 
> Jim, that raises one question.  How are we going to support searching
> for a name in all scopes, a la `info func'?  It seems that it might be
> prohibitively more expensive than it is currently...

I'm not so sure it would be all that more expensive, but if it was, we
could just throw all names into a global ternary search tree, and use
that for searches against all scopes.

For the example of "info func main", you just walk the tree to main, and
print out all children from there.

References:
- .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC 3.1-based compiler)
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC 3.1-based compiler)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC 3.1-based compiler)
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC 3.1-based compiler)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]