This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
typos in gdbint.texinfo
- From: "Theodore A. Roth" <troth at verinet dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:35:05 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: typos in gdbint.texinfo
Found these while skimming through gdbint.info.
Ted Roth
* gdbint.texinfo (Releasing GDB): Fix some typos.
Index: gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -p -r1.72 gdbint.texinfo
--- gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 6 Apr 2002 00:02:52 -0000 1.72
+++ gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 10 Apr 2002 16:12:42 -0000
@@ -4628,7 +4628,7 @@ symbol to write conditional code which s
such hosts.
@findex IS_DIR_SEPARATOR
-@item IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (@var{c}
+@item IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (@var{c})
Evaluates to a non-zero value if @var{c} is a directory separator
character. On Unix and GNU/Linux systems, only a slash @file{/} is
such a character, but on Windows, both @file{/} and @file{\} will
@@ -4930,7 +4930,7 @@ The @file{gdb/MAINTAINERS} file still ho
@item
Don't fix something on the branch unless/until it is also fixed in the
trunk. If this isn't possible, mentioning it in the @file{gdb/PROBLEMS}
-file is better than committing a hack
+file is better than committing a hack.
@item
When considering a patch for the branch, suggested criteria include:
Does it fix a build? Does it fix the sequence @kbd{break main; run}
@@ -4953,8 +4953,8 @@ reason) support for a new host are consi
@section Obsolete any code
Before anything else, poke the other developers (and around the source
-code) to see there is anything that can be removed from @value{GDBN} (an
-old target, an unused file).
+code) to see if there is anything that can be removed from @value{GDBN}
+(an old target, an unused file).
Obsolete code is identified by adding an @code{OBSOLETE} prefix to every
line. Doing this means that it is easy to identify obsolete code when