This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: KFAILs [Was: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp]
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: fnasser at redhat dot com
- Cc: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, drow at mvista dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, rob at welcomehome dot org
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 13:09:09 -0600
- Subject: Re: RFC: KFAILs [Was: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp]
Actually I prefer the pair "kpass/kfail" to "xpass/kfail" and "xpass/xfail"!
"xpass/kfail" looks weird and lets in some ambiguity. Can you implement it
as "kpass/kfail"?
fna> I can change things to accept the second form like setup_xfail does
fna> and just make sure that one with no '-' in it was found (the bug id)
fna> and error out if none was found. Just let me know if you prefer
fna> this instead of the positional first argument (I am now having
fna> second thoughts about that).
I don't have a strong preference. (It sounds like you don't either).
Michael C