This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> On Mar 20, 2002, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Cagney writes:
>
> >> > Other than the one that came with the patch posted to this mailing
> >> > list? I don't think so? Should I create one, install the patch and
> >> > then close it?
> >>
> >> I counted 4 or 5! You should look at gdb/390, there may still be
> >> ``issues''.
>
> > There is also 294 (which is essentially a duplicate of 390). Alex,
> > can you take a look? Maybe your configury test needs to be made a bit
> > more sophisticated.
>
> This is a totally different subject. This patch is for a build error
> on OSF1/DU/Tru64. Both PRs you mention are about TOC problems on
> AIX.
Sorry! Both Andrew and I were thinking of this other thread:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-02/msg00059.html
>
> >> > I'm not aware of such GDB policies :-(
>
> >> I think people doing this are viewed in a positive light (however there
> >> isn't any strict requirement :-).
>
> I never thought such a simple patch would take so long to get in (my
> fault; I dropped the ball in revising the patch as requested for a
> long while). Anyway, when a patch is ready, I see little value in
> creating a PR. To me, it feels like pure overhead. If you have a
> different opinion, please enlighten me :-)
>
Are any of the priority==high bugs related to this (as opposed to the
minimal-toc) problem?
Elena
> --
> Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
> Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
> CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
> Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer