This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] include/gdb/signals.h
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 05:26:51PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >>There should also be an entry for src/include/ChangeLog indicating the
> >>presence of the new directory.
> >
> >
> >Good thought. Since DJ said it wouldn't cause a problem, shall I
> >commit this?
>
> Commit to src, yep.
>
> I'm trying to figure out if DJ's reply:
>
> >I'm just wondering how DJ would react to the addition of an entry in
> >>gcc/include/ChangeLog there isn't a corresponding directory (gcc/include
> >>is the master yet really it isn't :-)
> >
> >
> >Not a problem. The scripts ignore anything in src that isn't also in
> >gcc, and this wouldn't be the first ignored subdirectory.
>
> is an ok to also commit the ChangeLog entry to the GCC include
> directory. I guess it is a doesn't matter. Come the revolution
> (GCC+GDB merge) I'd like to try to avoid a merge that looses src/include
> related ChangeLog entries.
Committed. DJ tells me that the scripts which sync the two include
directories will properly ignore ChangeLog entries (neat!) for things
which are not in both repositories.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer