This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doco] Srink the overlay diagram
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:13:10 +0200
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] Srink the overlay diagram
- References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020121115741.16755L-100000@is> <3C4C6FF4.7040108@cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:45:56 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
>
> I think the @group is needed around the actual diagram, I don't know
> about the accompanying text.
Yes, @group should be around the diagram.
> > In general, it's bad to have free text inside @example, since TeX
> > doesn't fill such text. So typesetting that is prone to unexpected
> > problems whenever you change the output dimensions slightly (e.g.,
> > with @smallbook etc.). It's best to avoid that entirely.
>
> What do you suggest? :-)
Leave the text outside the @example, and instead put "@need NUMBER"
before the @example which starts the diagram, where NUMBER is enough
to allow for both the diagram and the text after it. I'd use 10000
for NUMBER, but if you can easily print that page after TeXing it,
simply measure how many inches of vertical space does the diagram and
the text take, and multiply that by 1000.