This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Additional patches for UnixWare - procfs.c patch


See if you prefer this patch - though using elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus
as a #define may not be according to the coding standards. If so, please
upshift it.
The prototypes get rid of -Wprototype warnings.

2001-01-15  Rodney Brown  <rbrown64@csc.com.au>
     * procfs.c: Define elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus.
     Prototype elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus, elfcore_write_prfpreg,
     elfcore_write_prpsinfo.
     (procfs_do_thread_registers): Call elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus.

--- procfs.c.orig   Tue Jan 15 15:01:48 2002
+++ procfs.c   Wed Jan 16 12:28:16 2002
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Bosto
  *   Unixware
  *   AIX5
  *
- * /proc works by immitating a file system: you open a simulated file
+ * /proc works by imitating a file system: you open a simulated file
  * that represents the process you wish to interact with, and
  * perform operations on that "file" in order to examine or change
  * the state of the other process.
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ typedef struct siginfo gdb_siginfo_t;
 /* the name of the proc status struct depends on the implementation */
 typedef pstatus_t   gdb_prstatus_t;
 typedef lwpstatus_t gdb_lwpstatus_t;
+#  define elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus    elfcore_write_pstatus
 #else /* ! NEW_PROC_API */
 /* format strings for /proc paths */
 # ifndef CTL_PROC_NAME_FMT
@@ -323,8 +324,13 @@ typedef lwpstatus_t gdb_lwpstatus_t;
 /* the name of the proc status struct depends on the implementation */
 typedef prstatus_t gdb_prstatus_t;
 typedef prstatus_t gdb_lwpstatus_t;
+#  define elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus    elfcore_write_prstatus
 #endif /* NEW_PROC_API */

+char *elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus (bfd *, char *, int *, long, int, void *);
+char *elfcore_write_prfpreg (bfd  *, char *, int  *, void *, int);
+char *elfcore_write_prpsinfo (bfd  *, char *, int  *, char *, char *);
+
 typedef struct procinfo {
   struct procinfo *next;
   int pid;              /* Process ID    */
@@ -5733,12 +5739,12 @@ procfs_do_thread_registers (bfd *obfd, p
   merged_pid = TIDGET (ptid) << 16 | PIDGET (ptid);

   fill_gregset (&gregs, -1);
-  note_data = (char *) elfcore_write_prstatus (obfd,
-                                               note_data,
-                                               note_size,
-                               merged_pid,
-                               stop_signal,
-                                               &gregs);
+  note_data = (char *) elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus (obfd,
+                                note_data,
+                                note_size,
+                                merged_pid,
+                                stop_signal,
+                                &gregs);
   fill_fpregset (&fpregs, -1);
   note_data = (char *) elfcore_write_prfpreg (obfd,
                               note_data,



Michael Snyder wrote:
>
> rbrown64@csc.com.au wrote:
> >
> > 2002-01-15  Rodney Brown  <rbrown64@csc.com.au>
> >
> >      * config/i386/tm-i386v4.h: Define HAVE_I387_REGS.
> >      * config/i386/i386v42mp.mh: Add i387-nat.o .
> >      * i386v4-nat.c: Include i387-nat.h.
> >      (supply_fpregset): Use i387_supply_fsave.
> >      (fill_fpregset): Use i387_fill_fsave.
> >      * procfs.c(procfs_do_thread_registers): Use elfcore_write_pstatus
> >      if pstatus_t is available.
>
> The procfs.c portion is approved.

Actually, let me reconsider that.  Would you please try using
#ifdef NEW_PROC_API instead of HAVE_PSTATUS_T?





Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]