This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Additional patches for UnixWare - procfs.c patch
- From: rbrown64 at csc dot com dot au
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:33:40 +1100
- Subject: Re: Additional patches for UnixWare - procfs.c patch
See if you prefer this patch - though using elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus
as a #define may not be according to the coding standards. If so, please
upshift it.
The prototypes get rid of -Wprototype warnings.
2001-01-15 Rodney Brown <rbrown64@csc.com.au>
* procfs.c: Define elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus.
Prototype elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus, elfcore_write_prfpreg,
elfcore_write_prpsinfo.
(procfs_do_thread_registers): Call elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus.
--- procfs.c.orig Tue Jan 15 15:01:48 2002
+++ procfs.c Wed Jan 16 12:28:16 2002
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Bosto
* Unixware
* AIX5
*
- * /proc works by immitating a file system: you open a simulated file
+ * /proc works by imitating a file system: you open a simulated file
* that represents the process you wish to interact with, and
* perform operations on that "file" in order to examine or change
* the state of the other process.
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ typedef struct siginfo gdb_siginfo_t;
/* the name of the proc status struct depends on the implementation */
typedef pstatus_t gdb_prstatus_t;
typedef lwpstatus_t gdb_lwpstatus_t;
+# define elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus elfcore_write_pstatus
#else /* ! NEW_PROC_API */
/* format strings for /proc paths */
# ifndef CTL_PROC_NAME_FMT
@@ -323,8 +324,13 @@ typedef lwpstatus_t gdb_lwpstatus_t;
/* the name of the proc status struct depends on the implementation */
typedef prstatus_t gdb_prstatus_t;
typedef prstatus_t gdb_lwpstatus_t;
+# define elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus elfcore_write_prstatus
#endif /* NEW_PROC_API */
+char *elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus (bfd *, char *, int *, long, int, void *);
+char *elfcore_write_prfpreg (bfd *, char *, int *, void *, int);
+char *elfcore_write_prpsinfo (bfd *, char *, int *, char *, char *);
+
typedef struct procinfo {
struct procinfo *next;
int pid; /* Process ID */
@@ -5733,12 +5739,12 @@ procfs_do_thread_registers (bfd *obfd, p
merged_pid = TIDGET (ptid) << 16 | PIDGET (ptid);
fill_gregset (&gregs, -1);
- note_data = (char *) elfcore_write_prstatus (obfd,
- note_data,
- note_size,
- merged_pid,
- stop_signal,
- &gregs);
+ note_data = (char *) elfcore_write_gdb_prstatus (obfd,
+ note_data,
+ note_size,
+ merged_pid,
+ stop_signal,
+ &gregs);
fill_fpregset (&fpregs, -1);
note_data = (char *) elfcore_write_prfpreg (obfd,
note_data,
Michael Snyder wrote:
>
> rbrown64@csc.com.au wrote:
> >
> > 2002-01-15 Rodney Brown <rbrown64@csc.com.au>
> >
> > * config/i386/tm-i386v4.h: Define HAVE_I387_REGS.
> > * config/i386/i386v42mp.mh: Add i387-nat.o .
> > * i386v4-nat.c: Include i387-nat.h.
> > (supply_fpregset): Use i387_supply_fsave.
> > (fill_fpregset): Use i387_fill_fsave.
> > * procfs.c(procfs_do_thread_registers): Use elfcore_write_pstatus
> > if pstatus_t is available.
>
> The procfs.c portion is approved.
Actually, let me reconsider that. Would you please try using
#ifdef NEW_PROC_API instead of HAVE_PSTATUS_T?