Re: RFC: Inferior command line arguments

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>]

 > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:43:24PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:

 > Rather than continue down this path, I'd much rather see us fix or fork
 > GNU getopt so that we can detect the presence of '--'; I'd think in
 > fact we could do it without having to go through all these hoops, but I
 > haven't actually looked at the code.  If nothing else, this should be
 > possible:
 >
 >  - scan the command line for '--'
 >  - if found, save what's after as an inferior argv vector
 >  - shrink argv so it stops before the '--'
 >  - go through normal existing getopt loop
 > and optionally:
 >  - if we found a program name, tack it on at the beginning of the
 >    inferior argv; if we didn't, grab one from the beginning of the
 >    inferior argv.
 >
 > The use of -- is pretty standard; I'd like us to support it if we
 > could.


Unfortunatly ``--'' already has certain semantics.  Detecting it 
wouldn't be sufficient.  Consider things like:

	--argument-expected --
	-- --poor-programe-name-choice --poor-core-file-choice
	gdb --args -- gdb --args -- program arg arg

Tom's --args -- is somewhat grotesque but at least it is well defined. 
Something like:

	gdb --- gdb --- program arg arg

might be possible but it is really sugar for ``--args --''.

	Andrew