This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp
- To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:28:09 +0300
- CC: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <3B3B8433.7020300@cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:23:31 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
>
> The attatched patch addresses a DOS file name clash caused by all the
> mi0-var-*.exp files I recently created.
>
> Is this the correct way to do this? The files aren't used in a DOS build.
Yes, this is the way. However:
> + @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-var-cmd.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-varcmd.exp
> + @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-var-child.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-varchild.exp
These two still clash: truncation to 8+3 yields "mi0-varc.exp" for
both of them.
Actually, I wonder why do we have to keep those mi0- prefixes. This
is all in gdb.mi subdirectory, so there should be no need to stress
the fact we are talking about mi. If the zero is significant, we can
keep it, but "mi" can go, I think.