This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RFA: make D10V gdbarch functions static


> 2001-06-26  Jim Blandy  <jimb@redhat.com>
> 
> * d10v-tdep.c (10v_frame_chain_valid, d10v_use_struct_convention,
> 	d10v_breakpoint_from_pc, d10v_register_byte,
> 	d10v_register_raw_size, d10v_register_virtual_size,
> 	d10v_register_virtual_type, d10v_register_convertible,
> 	d10v_register_convert_to_virtual, d10v_register_convert_to_raw,
> 	d10v_make_daddr, d10v_make_iaddr, d10v_daddr_p, d10v_iaddr_p,
> 	d10v_convert_iaddr_to_raw, d10v_convert_daddr_to_raw,
> 	d10v_store_struct_return, d10v_store_return_value,
> 	d10v_extract_struct_value_address, d10v_frame_saved_pc,
> 	d10v_saved_pc_after_call, d10v_pop_frame, d10v_skip_prologue,
> 	d10v_frame_chain, d10v_frame_init_saved_regs,
> 	d10v_init_extra_frame_info, d10v_read_pc, d10v_write_pc,
> 	d10v_read_sp, d10v_write_sp, d10v_write_fp, d10v_read_fp,
> 	d10v_push_return_address, d10v_push_arguments,
> 	d10v_extract_return_value): Make these functions static.


I think everyone is pretty happy with the idea that static functions are 
a good thing.  BTW, if you're feeling daring, you could try deleting 
config/d10v/tm-d10v.h - I'd even call that obvious :-)

	Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]