This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: make D10V gdbarch functions static
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: RFA: make D10V gdbarch functions static
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:59:34 -0400
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <20010626184709.61B435E9CB@zwingli.cygnus.com>
> 2001-06-26 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
>
> * d10v-tdep.c (10v_frame_chain_valid, d10v_use_struct_convention,
> d10v_breakpoint_from_pc, d10v_register_byte,
> d10v_register_raw_size, d10v_register_virtual_size,
> d10v_register_virtual_type, d10v_register_convertible,
> d10v_register_convert_to_virtual, d10v_register_convert_to_raw,
> d10v_make_daddr, d10v_make_iaddr, d10v_daddr_p, d10v_iaddr_p,
> d10v_convert_iaddr_to_raw, d10v_convert_daddr_to_raw,
> d10v_store_struct_return, d10v_store_return_value,
> d10v_extract_struct_value_address, d10v_frame_saved_pc,
> d10v_saved_pc_after_call, d10v_pop_frame, d10v_skip_prologue,
> d10v_frame_chain, d10v_frame_init_saved_regs,
> d10v_init_extra_frame_info, d10v_read_pc, d10v_write_pc,
> d10v_read_sp, d10v_write_sp, d10v_write_fp, d10v_read_fp,
> d10v_push_return_address, d10v_push_arguments,
> d10v_extract_return_value): Make these functions static.
I think everyone is pretty happy with the idea that static functions are
a good thing. BTW, if you're feeling daring, you could try deleting
config/d10v/tm-d10v.h - I'd even call that obvious :-)
Andrew