Re: [RFA] Link remote target with svr4 solibs.

[Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>]

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> Michael Snyder wrote:
> 
> > > Doesn't this argue that this should reside somewhere above
> > > remote_open()?
> >
> > I'm open to suggestions.  The other place from which it is called
> > is fork_inferior.  Remote targets do not fork.  Open is the best
> > place I could think of.
> 
> Two thoughts.
> 
> remote_open_1()/remote_async_open_1() are slightly less painful than
> remote_open().
> 
> Given the current arrangement, there isn't much choice.
> 
> Assuming ok with J.T. as well, can you add it to those functions along
> with a FIXME.  Plenty of other examples can already be found.

OK with you, JT?