This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch

To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:23:12 -0500
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <200102210135.RAA21426@bosch.cygnus.com> <x7itm466ta.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <3A940B9C.696ACE7B@cygnus.com> <x7n1bfvje1.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu>

Daniel Berlin wrote:

> I did this at first, but it seemed those only happened for certain
> headers (something to do with $(SRCDIR)), so I undid it before
> submitting the patch.
> I'll redo it.

Yep.  What is happening is that no one can be bothered converting the
entire file to that convention - automake will make the problem go away
right :-).  Instead things just get incrementally tweaked when a new
file is added, broken include dependency gets noticed (or someone gets
board).

	Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Michael Snyder

References:
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]