This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
- To: chastain at cygnus dot com, jimb at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:55:02 -0800
- Cc: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, fnasser at cygnus dot com, fnasser at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, keiths at cygnus dot com
Hi Jim,
> So the real disagreement is whether this is a valuable thing to test
> for. Since I cannot imagine any reasonable inferior function
> invocation mechanism that would rely on the existence of malloc, I
> think it's as useless to test for that as to test for, say, the
> ability of GDB to handle functions named `t_structs_i' (which
> callfwmall also tests for us!).
Ah, yeah, now we are talking about the same thing, just disagreeing.
Which is how I hope to leave it.
Michael