This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] New register definition interface
Nick Duffek wrote:
>
> On 12-Jan-2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >At a guess the cli/* change is independant of the file reg.c.
>
> It depends on regs.c, but not vice versa. So yes, it could have been a
> separate add-on patch.
I'm confused. Your saying that the CLI changes depend on regs.c? I
think that is wrong. It should be possible to code the cli so that it
doesn't specificly depend on regs.c. Rather it depends on some abstract
interface. It might be implemented using regs.c but it might also be
implemented using more traditional methods.
Andrew