Re: RFA: gdbarch_free

[Jim Blandy <jimb at zwingli dot cygnus dot com>]

> > > >From memory, I figured that if an _initialize* function failed to create
> > > a gdbarch the process was somewhat hosed and calling internal_error()
> > > was probably the best thing to do.
> 
> > This situation could arise if someone adds support for a new variant
> > of my architecture, but hasn't updated GDB yet.
> 
> So the real question is, is this an internal_error() and how should
> it be handled?  I can be convinced either way on this :-)

No, it's okay, I'll just drop the memory.  I withdraw the patch.