This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the elfutils project.
Re: elfutils 0.156 released
- From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt at roeckx dot be>
- To: elfutils-devel at lists dot fedorahosted dot org
- Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:05:49 +0200
- Subject: Re: elfutils 0.156 released
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 05:49:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 05:35:32PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:24:49PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:22:33PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 15:27:37 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > > > > A new release of elfutils is available now at:
> > > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/releases/e/l/elfutils/0.156/
> > > > >
> > > > > I see a number of test failures:
> > > >
> > > > What is the OS vendor / arch / release?
> > >
> > > Debian unstable on amd64 (x86_64).
> > I did test on Debian squeeze (6.0.7) x86_64 and got all (94) PASS
> > test results. But squeeze is somewhat old (GCC 4.4.5, binutils 2.20.1).
> > I'll try to find a wheezy install.
> unstable currently has gcc 4.8.1, binutils 220.127.116.1130727,
> and libc 2.17
> I'm creating a wheezy chroot to see if I can reproduce it there.
So I can at least reproduce this on wheezy. Thta is with gcc
4.7.2, binutils 2.22, libc6 2.13.
> > How did you configure?
> What is important is probably that I use --enable-thread-safety.
> I think I mentioned this before and I think I should just remove
> that? Removing that at least removes one of the problems.
For refernce, this is how it gets called:
CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security" CPPFLAGS="-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,relro" \
./configure --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr \