This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the elfutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Add support for m68k
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: elfutils-devel at lists dot fedorahosted dot org
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 19:01:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for m68k
Mark Wielaard <email@example.com> writes:
> Is there a canonical ELF/gabi processor spec for m68k?
Not online, AFAIK. I have a paper copy of the m68k SysV ABI supplement,
but it doesn't contain anything related to DWARF.
> If so it would be good to add an URL in e.g. m68k_regs.c so others can
> easily lookup the register mappings described there. If the only
> "official" documentation is in GCC or binutils/gdb that would also be
> good to mention.
In effect, gcc is the canonical source of information.
> How does the make check result look on m68k with this patch applied?
Testsuite summary for elfutils 0.164
# TOTAL: 145
# PASS: 135
# SKIP: 10
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
> Could you provide testcases/files for run-readelf-mixed-corenote.sh,
> run-allregs.sh, run-strip-test?.sh and/or run-strip-reloc.sh. That way
> people can run make check on a non-m68k setup and see whether m68k ELF
> files are handled properly.
Yes, I can do that.
> If you are ambitious you could also add support for backtraces by
> implementing m68k_init_reg.c set_initial_registers_tid, m68k_cfi.c
> abi_cfi, frame_nregs.
My first goal was to get a clean testsuite, but I'll continue to work on
the optional parts.
Andreas Schwab, firstname.lastname@example.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."