Re: Evolution of the DocBook tools

[Eric Bischoff <ebisch at cybercable dot tm dot fr>]

Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> [snip]
> > Which programs don't recognize the CATALOG keyword? Jade and OpenJade
> > work with no problems. Programs that don't work aren't in accordance
> > with the specifications. Should we support them or "brake" them and
> > make the author improve their programs?
> 
> I'd break them, but I'm just a mean nasty guy...

;-)
The best is to offer the choice.

> > The problem with "iso-entities" is that some stylesheets refer to them
> > on it's catalog. Making a patch in a packaged distribution (RPM, deb,
> > etc.) is easy, but I don't know if it's good in a plain .tar.gz
> > distribution (of course, a note saying that files were modified and
> > the like would be enough).
> 
> When everything gets hashed out, just make a .tar.gz.  I'm quite sure that
> we can get a .spec file written for RPMs, either by myself or somebody who's
> better at it.  debs should be easy to make from there.

Already done (the .tar.gz and the .spec)

Rest of the discussion on the new list please.

-- 
Eric Bischoff  -  Documentation and Localization
Caldera (Deutschland) GmbH - Linux for Business!
Tel: +49 9131 7192 300 -  Fax: +49 9131 7192 399
http://www.caldera.de/