This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: "Abbreviated" DocBook
- From: Karl Eichwalder <ke at gnu dot franken dot de>
- To: Kevin Atkinson <kevin at atkinson dot dhs dot org>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:37:44 +0100
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: "Abbreviated" DocBook
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0201092339250.30326-100000@kevin.atkinson.dhs.org>
- Reply-to: Karl Eichwalder <keichwa at gmx dot net>
Kevin Atkinson <kevin@atkinson.dhs.org> writes:
> DocBook is too dam verbose, providing an entry for just about
> everything under the sun.
Try to enable SGML minimization features; but it looks as if you want
to write an m4-to-xml macro system :)
> Although you may disagree with me, it is so verbose that just reading
> a DocBook source document becomes rather difficult.
Emacs/psgml.el is able to hide tags and using xxml.el nifty colorings
are possible.
> At least to me the former is far easier to read and to enter in than
> the latter. So do you guys know of any utilities. I looked all over the
> net, but came up empty. If none exists it is highly likely that I whip up
> something myself. I honestly would like to know how people can stand
> editing raw DocBook.
It depends ;) Consider to use Texinfo and convert your Texinfo files
to DocBook using makeinfo from the latest pre-release of the texinfo
package (don't fear to report bugs or other shortcomings!).
> Even with emacs help it is still a bitch to both read and edit.
Some tempo.el templates can do wonders; for reading convert the document
to HTML and use your favorite browser for online reading.
--
ke@suse.de (work) / keichwa@gmx.net (home): |
http://www.suse.de/~ke/ | ,__o
Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)