This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML
- From: Dave Pawson <daveP at dpawson dot freeserve dot co dot uk>
- To: veillard at redhat dot com
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 18:04:21 +0000
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML
- References: <"from ndw"@nwalsh.com><20011221001441.K51511@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <87u1twa5c4.fsf@nwalsh.com>
At 03:40 09/01/2002 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Hum, one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no
>direct
> DocBook XML -> TeX
>transformations. Basically they require going through FO where the
>semantic is lost and only content/formatting is left, where then TeX
>is generated.
> Granted, LaTeX is not TeX, but isn't there more semantic to TeX than
>just content/formatting . Wouldn't a direct DocBook XML -> TeX transformation
>makes senses (I'm not asking if someone wants to do it or if it's simple ;-)
Sebastian Rahtz seems to think using Latex is not a good approach.
Almost for fun, I tried a java filter on the output of a transform,
to do some fairly obvious stuff, going into Latex.
I didn't go deep enough to prove it out but it seemed not unreasonable.
Regards daveP