This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See crosstool-NG for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: musl stable 1.1.11[1] / August 30, 2015


Hi@all,

depends on your definition of "stable" ... the musl-libc homepages says: "Mainline - 1.1.12 This series is actively developed but intended for use in production environments as long as appropriate testing is performed, and ..." ... "Stable - 1.0.5 This series does not add new features and avoids changes that might affect building packages against musl or using applications in environments where they are already known to work. It is intended mostly for developers targetting a fixed profile of application software and kernel, such as in embedded development. "

So i personally would like to have 1.1.12 instead of 1.0.5 :-) ... 

Cheers & thx for your work!
   Thorsten


On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 17:15:36 -0700
Reinoud Koornstra <reinoudkoornstra@gmail.com> wrote:

> True, but is that a stable release?
> 
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:58:04PM -0700, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> >> Hmm i see indeed on the musl page itself it's 1.0.5
> >> On https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musl I do see 1.1.11
> >
> > Well, that was true on August 30, 2015.
> >
> > musl-1.1.12 was released on October 19, 2015. As per usual, wikipedia is
> > just out of date. ;)
> >
> >> Hence I do not know where wikipedia got that info from.
> >> I'll assume it's wrong, because the musl page itself doesn't show this.
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Reinoud.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:13:38PM -0700, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> >> >> Hi Bryan,
> >> >>
> >> >> It seems that 1.1.11 is now the stable version of musl.
> >> >
> >> > Do you have a link/reference to this? Their website still says 1.0.5 is
> >> > (stable).
> >> >
> >> >> In my local system i changed the config options in config/libc/musl.in
> >> >>
> >> >> config LIBC_MUSL_V_1_12
> >> >>     bool
> >> >>     prompt "1.1.12 (Mainline)"
> >> >>     depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> >> >>
> >> >> config LIBC_MUSL_V_1_11
> >> >>     bool
> >> >>     prompt "1.1.11 (Stable)"
> >> >>
> >> >> and
> >> >>
> >> >> config LIBC_VERSION
> >> >>     string
> >> >> # Don't remove next line
> >> >> # CT_INSERT_VERSION_STRING_BELOW
> >> >>     default "1.1.12" if LIBC_MUSL_V_1_12
> >> >>     default "1.1.11" if LIBC_MUSL_V_1_11
> >> >>     default "custom" if LIBC_MUSL_V_CUSTOM
> >> >
> >> > You're more then welcome to open a pull request on Github, or send a
> >> > patch to the mailing list and I will open a pull request on your behalf.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > -Bryan
> 
> --
> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
> 


-- 
thorsten.johannvorderbrueggen@t-online.de <thorsten.johannvorderbrueggen@t-online.de>

-- 
Gem. Par. 28 Abs. 4 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
sowie der Weitergabe meiner personenbezogenen Daten für Zwecke der
Werbung sowie der Markt- oder Meinungsforschung.

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]